Reasons for Divorce, part 1

I just found  this article that references Dr. Helen Smith's book, "Why Men Are Boycotting Marriage, Fatherhood And The American Dream" in the Daily Mail and it's somewhere between pure cynicism and abandon all hope all ye who enter here. Read them and weep. ..or laugh. You won't be neutral.

...from the internet article:

According to the Office for National Statistics, marriage in Britain is at its lowest level since 1895. In 2011, there were just 286,634 ceremonies — a 41 per cent free fall from 1972, when 480,285 couples tied the knot.


For an army of women, Mr Right is simply not there, no matter how hard they look for him. And the reason? When it comes to marriage, men are on strike.


Why? Because the rewards are far less than they used to be, while the cost and dangers it presents are far greater.


‘Ultimately, men know there’s a good chance they’ll lose their friends, their respect, their space, their sex life, their money and — if it all goes wrong — their family,’ says Dr Helen Smith, author of Why Men Are Boycotting Marriage, Fatherhood And The American Dream.


‘They don’t want to enter into a legal contract with someone who could effectively take half their savings, pension and property when the honeymoon period is over.'


‘Men aren’t wimping out by staying unmarried or being commitment phobes. They’re being smart.’


So, what’s a man to do? ‘If he’s determined to get married, then he must get a pre-nuptial agreement,’ says Baldwin. ‘Otherwise steer clear altogether.'


‘Be in a relationship, even live together. But don’t get married. Especially if you have any prospect of making money.’


American social commentator Suzanne Venker agrees. The problem with divorce settlements, she says, is women want to have their cake and eat it.


‘We messed with the old marriage structure and now it’s broken,’ she says. ‘Back in the old days, stay-at-home mothers got a financial reward because child-rearing doesn’t pay cash.'


‘Now we want total independence from men, but if we divorce — even without having children — we expect to get alimony for ever. We can’t have it both ways.’


Along with the prospect of endless domestic criticism, this is why men are saying ‘I don’t’ rather than ‘I do’. Men need marriage like a fish needs a bicycle.


‘Many women have been raised to think of men as the enemy,’ says Venker. ‘It’s precisely this dynamic — women good, men bad — that has destroyed the relationship between the sexes.'


‘After decades of browbeating, men are tired. Tired of being told there’s something fundamentally wrong with them. Tired of being told that if women aren’t happy, it’s their fault. The rise of women has not threatened men. It has just irritated them.’


But by far the most negative aspect of marriage is the likelihood of being edited out of your children’s lives — if it all goes pear-shaped — by a state that has relegated the role of father to its lowest point ever.

That last paragraph is the most cruel ever, and the cause of many men just giving up on life - it has been arbitrarily ripped from them with no functional recourse. For this, there is no one but the women to blame and when it comes back to bite, your 'society' has had it.

My Family's Birth Rate

Following maternal side:

Great-grandparents: 12/couple: birth rate of 12 per couple

Grandparents: 4.5/couple: birth rate of 4.5 per couple

Parents: 3/couple: birth rate of 3 per couple
                         
Self & siblings: 5 children per 3 couples: birth rate of 1.67 per couple

Children (end of breeding ages): 2 children for 5 couples: = 0.4 children/couple

...and those emigrated to Slovenia! I wonder how they are fairing under the onslaught of muzzies... 
 

Paternal side numbers are not all available. Tentative estimation very poor at those in my generation are approximately 1.17 per couple, lower than our 1.67.

Looks like the my family is about to die out. Considering the guesstamate of 4.5 children per couple in my combined grandparents generation and the 0.4 children per couple in my and my cousins generation, we've dropped by a factor of {11, and a factor of 30 from my great-grandparents day.

Most of my generation and my childrens generation were seriously affected by parents divorce and grandparents divorce. Society is far more accepting of whoring around and there are harsh penalties for men in a divorce despite not being at fault. The following anecdote is typical for virtually all men these days, makes marriage an extremely poor bet:

"As you know, there are certain “givens” in a divorce. The wife is going to get the house, car, kids, savings and retirement accounts, plus child support, dental and medical care, and the dog. In certain states she is eligible for alimony as well.

The husband gets squat. Well, at least in Florida he can get debtor's prison. That's something. His quality of life will diminish somewhat, living in the dismal dump that is all he can afford. At least the roaches are large and numerous enough to provide plenty of protein. The judge can set any amount of the husband's income for child support, etc. with automatic adjustments for inflation. Supreme judicial prejudice is the law of the land. Keep in mind, the ratchet works only one way. It always goes up, never down. What happens if he gets a raise? Yup. Sweet little Ellie Sue can petition the court and presto, she gets a whacking big increase in child support, etc. The State gets some as well. His tax rate reflects the total raise, hence the raise is actually a decrease of income while child support has gone up! Please boss, don't give me another raise or I'll go broke!

What happens if he looses his job? Why, it becomes rather difficult to pay child support. The State will rather rapidly throw one in debtor's prison where he has 6 months to re-consider the wonderfulness of the most beautiful girl under the bleachers and their 6 snot monsters. The State will save one the problem of renewing any licenses that one may need for future employment, driver's license as well. They all get canceled. So when the poor critter gets out, he'll be homeless, his vehicle impoundment charges exceed its value, his household goods including that wonderful dented aluminum pot he got at the flea market he boiled his morning gruel in, have been donated to a worthy charity. The one that has many fleet feet and comes by night. ...and he still owes child support."

I wrote that in an essay concerning a friend and it is soooo universal I'm tempted to copyright it! My father, myself, four good friends, and a number of aquaintances have all been through unfaithful wives and horrendous divorce settlements. Don't let the little head lead son, it's not too bright. ...and sweet little Ellie Sue will have you gnawing your arm off if you've guessed wrong.

Been there, done that, got the scars.

I don't see any way for this trend to turn around with the birth rates of caucasians running 1.8 children per couple and falling in the US and far lower in Europe with no acceptable explanation for it. 2013 saw caucasian children become the minority in the US, it seems to just be an attitude. War drums courtesy of the wonderful, piece of crap, "religion of peace", brainless, soon-to-be atomic-powered muslims, the extremely shaky state of world economics, the massive third-world exodus due to muslim control into Europe (that is going to turn out really well), the uncontrolled chicano invasion that carries all forms of other organisms and attitudes with it, and a general population that just doesn't give a damn. It's sad seeing the US turning into Nicaragua and Nairobi, breeding without a thought only to live in crime and filth like their parents, grandparents, etc. It'll end the way it always does: war, only this time with atomics instead of TNT, savages with Sarin instead of swords. How it'll resolve itself should prove quite interesting. What is that old, Jewish curse, "may you live in interesting times?" The attitude not to breed was quite high back in the 1970's, San Francisco with the Cold War running toasty, real fears (now true) of over-population lowering living standards, rising crime rates, and whole populations being deliberately dumbed-down for something as venal as political "power."

On top of that, one has a corrupt court system and "laws" that should be a very strong deterrent to marriage and responsible fatherhood. Males, especially white males, are seen as the cause of all difficulties in society, just a general bummer for fatherhood.

None of us want to send our not-to-be children into such a world. Selfish? I don't think so.

Now it's time for a break. Go read Where Did It Go?

Muzzie I.Q.'s

Did you ever notice that one of the most primitive, lowest IQ, people on earth are Muslim? Why is that? After much web searching, the only significant Muslim contribution to humankind found has been two pitiful methods of population control [1] and, if one can consider it a "contribution", the Koran. The best and the brightest Arabs have NOT been Muslim, thus tentatively ruling out race. Algebra is widely considered muslim, however algebra came about before old Mo, the baby-raper, came about. Omar Khayyam, 18 May 1048 – 4 December 1131, my favorite poet and middle-ages mathematician, survived despite being an infidel.

Muslims are 24% of the world's population and have won 11 out of 800 Nobel Prizes or (11/800) x 100 = 1.375%. Kinda tiny especially since one of the eleven was Yassar Arafat's "Pieces Prize" (7 of the 11 were for Arab "Pieces" prizes). Two were for literature, one for physics, and one for chemistry. I think we can safely rule out the Pieces prizes as some Norwegian black humor and that leaves us with (4/800) x 100 = 1/2 of one per cent of the Nobels, VERY tiny.

Let's see, they are beyond dumb. Makes dumb look like smart. Makes "Deliverance" hillbillies look like rocket scientists. Stupidity so thick even X-rays can't penetrate it. Dumb so dense that they must wipe their asses with their hands as toilet paper, oh wait, they do...

Oh. That's right. They're only supposed to get their "knowledge" from the holyshit koran. ...and after 1400 years of selective inbreeding, have a fine crop of cretins taught to slaughter all infidels, even other inbreds who "worship" that tiny little made-up moon god, allah, differently. And you thought L. Ron Hubbard's Scientology was bad! At least his made-up religion was just the result of a bet between him and Robert Heinlein and doesn't murder millions, merely shows how dense some are. In old Mo's case, he had the ready-made collection of folk estimated to be approximately 250,000 years behind northern European and northern Chinese in evolution. They were easily led by an alpha (I spelled "aphid". Was I wrong?) in their boozing, doping, and raping in their pedophilic prophet's name. Too bad their "religion" forbids boozing and wenching in the here-and-now, might be some of the reason they keep their women in bags! See it, screw it seems to be the case. There are some excellent videos our troops sent back from allah-land, just use the search engine on liveleak.com, look for "donkey f**kers", and prepare for some good chuckles. "Deliverance" has nothing on those critters. IQ maybe 30, have some fine taste in the female form... I hear muzzies don't like dawgs. ...wonder why?

...just did another cross match between islamic populations and IQ averages. Yup. You guessed it. Itty-bitty IQ's and islam go together like pork and beans! Notice how it spreads like a disease from its source? Unstoppable, and with low-IQ people outbreeding the higher by an average of 1.5 (less than replacement) children per normal woman to 8.3 children per muslim woman, it won't take many generations before humankind will all be dumb and muslim. Oh well. ...fun while it lasted.

Which is cause and which is effect? Since islam has only been around for 1400 years or so, 3 guesses and the first 2 don't count. Why is central Africa so low with Guinea at a 59 IQ? Central Africa has been estimated to be 400,000 years behind northern European and Chinese in evolution.

Tiny little minds are easily led in animalistic fantasies like our old pal Mo's. Did he have Kuru?

The guy to the left is expressing his displeasure that his favorite goat is to be eaten this evening.

[1] The first method is rather traumatic and requires the children of warring parties (all) to use

children to clear minefields. Although rough on kids, it's usually quick and provides needed

nourishment for the poor desert buzzards. Iran and Iraq practiced this method for eight years

with poor results: the women kept cranking them out quicker than they could be blown up.

The second method is traumatic, however only for creatures such as donkeys and goats.

These practices have provided much merriment for our boys in desert camo!

Since only the big swinging dicks can have the four or five bags of wife and the really big

swinging dicks can have as many bags as they want, the miserable, little sandfleas don't

get none. This makes them upset and since they can't get drunk and start good bar-fights (oh, such wonderful memories!), the livestock unhappily has to do double duty.

There is a third method under development by Iran with the full assistance and cooperation

of Barack Hussein Obama, another dim bulb of a muslim, and it should work for the entire

world. However, this method does have a few side effects that are hard to control.

Dr. Strangelove: more fun than the 12th Imam